|
It is scientifically impossible
to prove that certain dog breeds
are genetically "dangerous."
When countries, states, and
cities, impose Breed Specific
Legislation, they base it on
that certain dog breeds are
dangerous.
Papers done by the scientific
community regarding genetics and
"dangerous dog breeds."
Quotes by the scientific
community regarding genetics and
"dangerous dog breeds."
-
As for statistics used to
support the idea that some
breeds are more dangerous,
the numbers are misleading.
There's a problem getting
records. "Golden retrievers
bite, Labrador retrievers
bite, but don't get
reported." (Dr. Pobderscek).
-
"Valuable scientific studies
showing significant
differences in jaw strength
among breeds does not exist"
(Dr. Stur, 2000).
-
"The classification of dog
breeds with respect to their
relative danger to humans
makes no sense, as both, the
complex ancedent conditions
in which aggressive behavior
occurs, and its ramifying
consequences in the
individual dog's ecological
and social environment are
not considered" (Dr.
Fedderson-Peterson, 2001).
-
"Currently no valuable
scientific method to
evaluate the tolerance to
pain is available" (Dr. Stur,
2000).
-
"There is absolutely no
evidence for the existence
of any kind of "locking
mechanism" unique to the
structure of the jaw and/or
teeth of the American Pit
Bull Terrier" (Dr. Brisbin).
|